WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 14 January 2013

Okay, this is weird...

Posted on 11:15 by Unknown
For a long time, we've known that George W. Bush took "French leave" of the Texas Air National Guard in 1972, ostensibly to work on the Senate campaign of Winton "Red" Blount. This site claims that Dubya's true purpose was to spy on the campaign of George Wallace, who mounted a serious threat -- from the right -- to Nixon's re-election bid. Those of you old enough to recall that year will know that, although Wallace had no chance at victory as a third-party candidate, he did threaten to split the conservative vote in states Nixon needed.

Supposedly, the evidence for the "Dubya as spy" allegation comes from documents compiled by a man named Seymore Trammell, who was Wallace's campaign director.
Local conversations in and around Montgomery were that Bush Jr. spent his time dating local women and hanging out at the Wallace political gatherings.

To the casual observer, the young Bush presented himself as a pilot interested in local politics and a good time party guy. This was very common in Montgomery at that time.

Those who encountered Bush in Alabama remember him as an affable social drinker who acted younger than his 26 years. Sources say he also tended to show up late every day, around noon or one, at Blount’s campaign headquarters in Montgomery.
It was John N. Mitchell, after being betrayed by Nixon, who confessed to Trammell, how Nixon had dispatched his ‘assassination team’ by orchestrating a near fatal auto crash in Oct. of 1971; Mitchell also confirmed “W” being dispatched as a political spy for daddy Bush and President Richard Nixon.

Roger Ailes

Roger Ailes to H.R. Haldeman refers on page 3 to an apparent plan to infiltrate George Wallace’s 1972 presidential campaign. http://edge-cache.gawker.com/gawker/ailesfiles/ailes2.html
Don't expect to see this matter discussed on Fox News anytime soon. The image to your left comes from the Ailes memo referenced above. (It was written on November 25, 1970.)

I have no doubt that the Wallace campaign was indeed "spooked" by the Trickster's team -- but is there any truth to the claim that Dubya was the infiltrator? Ya got me!

The site also asserts that Nixonian forces not only engineered the assassination attempt on Wallace but also tried to kill Trammell.
Widely reported discrepancies, emerging at the time of the investigation, including the fact that Bremer’s finger and palm prints were not found on the gun, although he is shown on film without gloves, and, the bullets that entered Wallace showed trajectories from above and behind, in spite of Bremer firing all four shots from directly in front of Wallace.

The entire scene was captured by a CBS News camera crew, purportedly on a tip from the CIA to “be there that day.” The bullets struck three witnesses, two were removed and recovered, however, the bullets were so damaged that not one of them could be linked to Bremer’s gun.

Maryland police originally sent out a wanted message for a second man believed to be involved in the shooting, but later retracted it and said it was a mistake.
Let me be clear: I know nothing about the reliability of this site. My wariness stems from the fact that, in recent times, we have been inundated with disinformation about the assassinations which once figured so heavily in American political life.

For what it is worth, Wallace privately told inquirers that he thought Nixon ordered the hit. Wallace even suggested to a Los Angeles Times reporter that G. Gordon Liddy had met with Arthur Bremer.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ▼  January (57)
      • Cops
      • How black was my helicopter
      • Non sequitur of the day: "Second Amendment!"
      • A voting rights amendment
      • "Blood libel"
      • David Brooks' advice to Republicans
      • "The Untold History of the United States"
      • The plot against Aaron Swartz
      • Which conspiracy theories have merit? Which are no...
      • Notes...
      • Women in combat
      • The Untouchables
      • The best conspiracy theory I've seen all day
      • Hillary, Benghazi and the Johnson Unit
      • Zero Dark Thirty and the Al Qaeda mysteries
      • A story about guns
      • Obama's inaugural poem (updated)
      • "If someone says we have to talk peace, he’s consi...
      • The Second Amendment isn't in danger -- it's all t...
      • The Sandy Hook Pseudotruthers
      • Tyranny...?
      • Follow-up post on the Awlaki mystery
      • The inevitable follow-up post on guns (with an add...
      • What Aaron Swartz actually did
      • The inevitable gun control post
      • Is there a hidden side to the Swartz story?
      • Mickey Mouse killed Aaron Swartz
      • Atrios gets it right
      • Okay, this is weird...
      • What's it going to be: Social Security or Defense?...
      • Psy War
      • No coin
      • RFK Jr. on the murder of his uncle
      • School prayer: The devil really IS in the details
      • Noteworthy...
      • Red State Hell
      • "BAM! I cannot believe how idiot these people are!"
      • Can we use The Coin to pay Atlas to shrug?
      • Laptop vs. tablet
      • Noted...
      • Brother, can you spare a trillion-dollar coin?
      • Aw, shoot
      • I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this (up...
      • A little advice
      • Austerity won't work
      • The Awlaki mystery: Was he one of ours? Is he real...
      • FBI abets plot to assassinate Occupy leaders
      • "Terrorists and pedophiles and cannibals -- oh my!"
      • Ah, 1966!
      • I've been waiting decades for this one...
      • Some conspiracies are open
      • King's speech
      • Still more cliff notes
      • Let's focus on what's really important
      • What...?
      • 2016: It's over, baby
      • A look back at stuff
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile