WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

The inevitable gun control post

Posted on 11:02 by Unknown
Obama's executive order proposals on gun regulation look reasonable, at least to my eyes. If you're a gun nut, your eyes probably work differently. The stuff he hopes to get through Congress won't go anywhere.

This excerpt from Obama's speech should give you the gist:
The law already requires licensed gun dealers to run background checks, and over the last 14 years that’s kept 1.5 million of the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun.

But it’s hard to enforce that law, when as many as 40 percent of all gun purchases are conducted without a background check. That’s not safe. That’s not smart. That’s not fair to responsible gun buyers or sellers.

If you want to buy a gun, whether it’s from a licensed dealer, or a private seller, you should at least have to show you are not a felon or somebody legally prohibited from buying one. This is common sense. And an overwhelming majority of Americans agree with us on the need for universal background checks, including more than 70 percent of the National Rifle Association’s members according to one survey.
Yeah, but the 30 percenters are going to be very, very loud.

I'm reminded of the Obamacare fight, which had a paradoxical effect: The President paid the political price for inflicting "socialized medicine" on the nation -- even though he began the process by taking actual socialized medical insurance off the table. Now, Obama will be labeled a gun-grabber -- even though, in the end, I doubt that he'll grab a single gun.

The NRA responded to the President before he got a chance to say anything, which is a neat trick. They think Obama is a hypocrite because armed Secret Service guards protecting his daughters carry weapons.
This does actually reveal an important aspect of the NRA's world view. As far as they're concerned, all of us should act as though we exist in the same security situation as the president of the United States. You may think you're just the assistant regional manager of a widget company, but in fact, a terrorist commando strike force could be coming to lay siege to your home at any moment. Which is why you need to be prepared not just with a gun, but with enough weaponry to hold your own in the two-hour firefight that's just inevitable.
I would add that those Secret Service guards are there to protect the President's family from the exactly the same sort of rage-filed paranoia buffs to whom the NRA has addressed its argument. So there's hypocrisy and then there's hypocrisy.

There are people in this country who apparently want all social relations reduced to the concept of one person getting the drop on another:

"Time for lunch, Timmy!" says mother as she cocks her Glock. "Not so fast, mother dear," says Timmy as he dashes out of the pantry brandishing his Colt. "I couldn't help noticing the non-premium kibble in my dish," says Rover, who has a rocket launcher strapped to his back...

Let's all calm down and speak realistically. When this whole thing shakes out, I'm pretty sure that nobody is going to have to give up any armaments. Okay, maybe a few schizophrenics will lose easy access to firearms. I'm fine with that, and you should be as well.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • HUMAN FILTH
    A 28 year-old woman went into a branch of the Louvre and used permanent marker to scrawl "AE 911" on Delacroix's immortal ...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...
  • Hastings thought someone had tampered with his car
    I didn't want to crowd out the preceding post so soon, because the topic is important and I even did a spot of original research on the ...
  • What about the Senate?
    According to Pew, Obama has an 8 point edge over Romney. Rachel Maddow spent much of her show crowing about the new numbers, while wonderin...
  • White Christmas, crazy Christmas
    Being a California lad, I've not had many white Christmases. But the first snow of the season fell today in Baltimore, and the town look...
  • Is Obama screwing us again? Already?
    I had hoped Obama would refrain from screwing us over until after the inauguration. The outcome of the fiscal cliff negotiations will tell ...
  • Chemical weapons in Syria: Whodunnit?
    Well, John Kerry may have achieved his "Colin Powell at the UN" moment... In some of the administration’s most strident language,...
  • The best blog post ever?
    A friend to this blog directs our attention to what may be the single finest blog post ever written . Wish to hell I had written it. But if ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ▼  January (57)
      • Cops
      • How black was my helicopter
      • Non sequitur of the day: "Second Amendment!"
      • A voting rights amendment
      • "Blood libel"
      • David Brooks' advice to Republicans
      • "The Untold History of the United States"
      • The plot against Aaron Swartz
      • Which conspiracy theories have merit? Which are no...
      • Notes...
      • Women in combat
      • The Untouchables
      • The best conspiracy theory I've seen all day
      • Hillary, Benghazi and the Johnson Unit
      • Zero Dark Thirty and the Al Qaeda mysteries
      • A story about guns
      • Obama's inaugural poem (updated)
      • "If someone says we have to talk peace, he’s consi...
      • The Second Amendment isn't in danger -- it's all t...
      • The Sandy Hook Pseudotruthers
      • Tyranny...?
      • Follow-up post on the Awlaki mystery
      • The inevitable follow-up post on guns (with an add...
      • What Aaron Swartz actually did
      • The inevitable gun control post
      • Is there a hidden side to the Swartz story?
      • Mickey Mouse killed Aaron Swartz
      • Atrios gets it right
      • Okay, this is weird...
      • What's it going to be: Social Security or Defense?...
      • Psy War
      • No coin
      • RFK Jr. on the murder of his uncle
      • School prayer: The devil really IS in the details
      • Noteworthy...
      • Red State Hell
      • "BAM! I cannot believe how idiot these people are!"
      • Can we use The Coin to pay Atlas to shrug?
      • Laptop vs. tablet
      • Noted...
      • Brother, can you spare a trillion-dollar coin?
      • Aw, shoot
      • I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this (up...
      • A little advice
      • Austerity won't work
      • The Awlaki mystery: Was he one of ours? Is he real...
      • FBI abets plot to assassinate Occupy leaders
      • "Terrorists and pedophiles and cannibals -- oh my!"
      • Ah, 1966!
      • I've been waiting decades for this one...
      • Some conspiracies are open
      • King's speech
      • Still more cliff notes
      • Let's focus on what's really important
      • What...?
      • 2016: It's over, baby
      • A look back at stuff
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile