WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 14 June 2013

Nothing to hide

Posted on 15:27 by Unknown


When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have drapes over their windows.

The sheepish ones may not be doing anything of interest to the FBI now, but we have no idea what the future will bring. A government that seems acceptable now may turn oppressive later. The NSA has set up the infrastructure for an Orwellian nightmare, and then they tell us that this infrastructure will be used only against foreign terrorists (and Iranians). Maybe you can accept these assurances, but I think it's only a matter of time before totalitarianism seeps in.

We did not vote for this infrastructure. That massive facility in Utah was created without debate, without a public dialogue. The NSA says that everything they do has the approval of Congress, yet congressfolk complain that they can't get straightforward answers from the NSA.

And now, for those who aren't allergic to a bit of foil...
In the past, I've mentioned an eccentric writer named Jon Rappoport. He impressed me in the Reagan era with some good reportage published in the L.A. Weekly, but in later times he...well, let's just say the dude got weird. Annoyingly weird.

His latest essays on the Snowden controversy are in this tradition of weirdness. Even so, I must confess that this stuff is dangerously intriguing. See here and here.

In short and in sum, Rappoport thinks that Ed Snowden has a suspicious bio. And let's face it: He does. Young Snowy segued into the heart of the American intelligence system with unnerving rapidity. No, he didn't go to the prom wearing a cloak and dagger -- but only because he was never formally graduated.
In 2003, at age 19, without a high school diploma, Snowden enlists in the Army. He begins a training program to join the Special Forces. The sequence here is fuzzy. At what point after enlistment can a new soldier start this training program? Does he need to demonstrate some exceptional ability before Special Forces puts him in that program?

Snowden breaks both legs in a training exercise. He’s discharged from the Army. Is that automatic? How about healing and then resuming Army service? Just asking.

If he was accepted in the Special Forces training program because he had special computer skills, then why discharge him simply because he broke both legs?

Circa 2003 (?), Snowden gets a job as a security guard for an NSA facility at the University of Maryland. He specifically wanted to work for NSA? It was just a generic job opening he found out about?

Also in 2003 (?), Snowden shifts jobs. He’s now in the CIA, in IT. He has no high school diploma. He’s a young computer genius?

In 2007, Snowden is sent to Geneva. He’s only 23 years old. The CIA gives him diplomatic cover there. He’s put in charge of maintaining computer-network security. Major job. Obviously, he has access to a very wide range of classified documents. Sound a little odd? Again, just asking. He’s just a kid. Maybe he has his GED by now. Otherwise, he still doesn’t have a high school diploma....
Sorry for such a lengthy quote, but Rappoport's right: Snowy is an oddity. He's a bit like David Lynch's Inland Empire: Admirable and inexplicable.

In a follow-up piece, Rappoport trots out his Big Theory that Snowden has always been a CIA employee, deep cover, and that he hopped on over to the NSA to ratfuck No Such Agency pursuant to an ongoing NSA-CIA turf war.
This was a covert op launched by the CIA against a chief rival, the NSA. NSA, the agency that’s far bigger than the CIA. NSA, the agency that’s been taking over intelligence gathering, that considers itself superior to everybody else in the intelligence field.

The CIA, of course, couldn’t be seen as the NSA leaker. They needed a guy. They needed a guy who could appear to be FROM the NSA, to make things look worse for the NSA and shield the CIA.
I'm not persuaded by this argument. Not at all. Still...

Still, Rappoport has one thing right: Ed is odd.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...
  • My home town (Plus: Am I a racist for noticing this...?)
    Behold, the greatest Rifftrax riff EVER. 16 seconds of pure capital-T TRUTH. From the Urban dictionary, this definition of Dundalk: ...a rot...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ▼  June (40)
      • The Hypersexualization of Everything
      • Debt slavery
      • The messenger, and how to shoot him
      • Old soldiers never die. They just...listen in.
      • Arianna, your roots are showing
      • The Supreme Court embraces the "voter fraud" myth
      • Marian: "You speak treason!" Robin: "Fluently."
      • Spook
      • The REAL story
      • Endgame: The death of Michael Hastings
      • Did the NSA spy on Barack Obama?
      • "Nobody is listening to your phone calls": Oh REAL...
      • Sick think and Ed Snowden
      • World's scariest video
      • Obama arouses Ayres
      • The weird and wonderful world of Ed Snowden
      • Space
      • Two questions
      • GAY BDSM PORN AT THE CIA!
      • Nothing to hide
      • Orwell cackles
      • NSAaaaaaaAAARRRRGH!!!!
      • Hey, Ed...let ME have a crack at it!
      • How do you solve a problem like MARINA?
      • A scene from my home...
      • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
      • Proof that Snowden's a good guy
      • Call me naive...
      • Quick NSA note
      • GOT
      • Hard reality
      • The Prism documents: Are they "Rather" deceptive?
      • PRISM and the plot AGAINST Obama
      • NSA spying on your phone records: Here's the part ...
      • The telltale corpse
      • "Don’t you remember what happened to Martin Luther...
      • Around and about...
      • A further thought on a mysterious shooting
      • The strange death of Ibragim Todashev (Updated)
      • Shot in the back of the head
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile