WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 5 November 2012

This is as close to conspiracy theory as Josh Marshall gets

Posted on 06:22 by Unknown
Josh Marshall has received a report which, though vague, bugs him. It bugs me too, because it ties in with a lot of strange material I've been seeing on the right-wing sites.

Under the heading "This could get weird," Marshall writes:
Listening to a story from a friend this evening. Guy in a social setting talking to a group of Wall Street heavyweights. Every single one in the room certain Romney wins. Has Ohio locked. Has the whole thing tied up. No doubt.
And that's it. But it's enough to unnerve, is it not? 

Most of the final polling shows Obama opening up or expanding upon a lead, and yet some conservative bloggers are sounding a triumphalist "got it in the bag" theme. Their lack of worry has me worried. 

I'm also bugged by the outlier polls from GOP-friendly firms which show Romney ahead or even-steven in places like Pennsylvania and Minnesota, even though all other polls show a comfortable Obama lead. Biased polling is a factor in American politics, but such reports usually show up earlier in the cycle. In the final stretch of the final stretch, polling firms usually try to get real. 

Incidentally, one of the above links goes to WizBang, where Doug Johnson argues that Romney will win because 59% of Independents will vote Republican. Johnson ignores one of the odder aspects of this election -- many conservatives have shed the "R" identifier. Registered Republicans are down to only 24-25 percent of the electorate, while Dems are at 32 percent and Independents are at 38, an all-time high. 

The interesting question is this: Have the non-R conservatives escaped the confines of the party because they think modern Republicans politicians are too extreme? Or has the GOP label lost its allure because the candidates are not extreme enough?

At any rate, the difference between 32% D and 24% R explains why there are more right-leaning Indys.  It also explains why the polls allegedly "skewed" in favor of Team D aren't really skewed at all.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • HUMAN FILTH
    A 28 year-old woman went into a branch of the Louvre and used permanent marker to scrawl "AE 911" on Delacroix's immortal ...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...
  • Hastings thought someone had tampered with his car
    I didn't want to crowd out the preceding post so soon, because the topic is important and I even did a spot of original research on the ...
  • What about the Senate?
    According to Pew, Obama has an 8 point edge over Romney. Rachel Maddow spent much of her show crowing about the new numbers, while wonderin...
  • White Christmas, crazy Christmas
    Being a California lad, I've not had many white Christmases. But the first snow of the season fell today in Baltimore, and the town look...
  • Is Obama screwing us again? Already?
    I had hoped Obama would refrain from screwing us over until after the inauguration. The outcome of the fiscal cliff negotiations will tell ...
  • Chemical weapons in Syria: Whodunnit?
    Well, John Kerry may have achieved his "Colin Powell at the UN" moment... In some of the administration’s most strident language,...
  • The best blog post ever?
    A friend to this blog directs our attention to what may be the single finest blog post ever written . Wish to hell I had written it. But if ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ▼  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ▼  November (41)
      • A thought just occurred to me...
      • Why they're after Rice
      • The country-we-dare-not-name is at it again
      • Glenn Beck and The Truth about bad art
      • Polonium and the press
      • Did Grover rewrite history?
      • Papa John's Pizza goes COMMIE!
      • Sartorial notes
      • Walmart or Wal-Mart? A correction
      • In observance of the Conspiracy Theorist Full Empl...
      • Happy Thanksgiving
      • How you can fix the system (without spending a dime)
      • Black Thursday
      • Gaza
      • Keep Black Friday on FRIDAY
      • What to do about Wal-Mart
      • Of Beck and Bain
      • Some women...!
      • Is Boot why Petraeus got the boot?
      • Petraeus
      • 2016 starts NOW!
      • A modest proposal for a new cable channel: RYTV
      • Praise be unto God
      • Romney and the Muslim vote
      • Why Mitt lost: A parable
      • The scorpion that stung Mitt Romney
      • What fresh hell is this? (Updated)
      • Last-minute Romney scandals
      • And now you must choose...
      • This is as close to conspiracy theory as Josh Mars...
      • Mitt profited from the auto bailout
      • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these fina...
      • That's it. Obama's doomed.
      • Why are the pro-Romney forces spending big money i...
      • What to do when a Bishop goes bonkers?
      • Obama 2016!
      • Who did it? A child abuse mystery (UPDATED)
      • The non-human victims of Sandy
      • Is the election over...?
      • The Weimar error
      • My premature Romney political obituary
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile