WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 1 November 2012

The Weimar error

Posted on 17:23 by Unknown
Truthout has a pretty good article up about the parallels between modern Tea Party populism and the rise of the "fringe" right in Germany during the Weimar era. Unfortunately, authors Charles Derber and Yale Magrass fall prey to a common mistake...
Contrary to common wisdom, the ascendancy of the Tea Party, Christian fundamentalist, militarist, anti-feminist, anti-immigrant and other racially-coded right-wing elements in the Republican Party - that could gain preponderant influence over the nation in a Romney/Ryan Administration - is not new. It is the most recent example of the "Weimar Syndrome," where liberal and Left parties fail to solve serious economic crises, helping right-wing movements and policies - that lack major public support, but are groomed and funded by the corporate and military establishment - to take power.
A lot of people seem to be under the misapprehension that the Nazis gained power because a liberal government failed to deal with the Depression. Not true. Neither Heinrich BrĂ¼ning nor Franz von Papen were anyone's idea of liberal politicians. They were, in fact, locatable somewhere to the right of Herbert Hoover, and they lost the support of both the public and the corporate world because the laissez-faire, "small government" austerity measures they advocated simply did not work.

The failure of Weimar was, in short, the failure of traditional conservatism. But that fact doesn't mean that the Nazis should be viewed as liberals, although quite a few modern propagandists have tried to sell that historical absurdity to an ignorant public. The brownshirts had, in fact, murdered many liberals, and they allied themselves with anti-socialist parties throughout Europe. 

The German fascists won over the public by -- shades of Mitt Romney! -- being vague. They literally told newspaper reporters that "We are against whatever the situation is right now." They offered few specifics beyond those words. In that way, the Nazis were able to be all things to all people. Or at least to enough people to win power.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ▼  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ▼  November (41)
      • A thought just occurred to me...
      • Why they're after Rice
      • The country-we-dare-not-name is at it again
      • Glenn Beck and The Truth about bad art
      • Polonium and the press
      • Did Grover rewrite history?
      • Papa John's Pizza goes COMMIE!
      • Sartorial notes
      • Walmart or Wal-Mart? A correction
      • In observance of the Conspiracy Theorist Full Empl...
      • Happy Thanksgiving
      • How you can fix the system (without spending a dime)
      • Black Thursday
      • Gaza
      • Keep Black Friday on FRIDAY
      • What to do about Wal-Mart
      • Of Beck and Bain
      • Some women...!
      • Is Boot why Petraeus got the boot?
      • Petraeus
      • 2016 starts NOW!
      • A modest proposal for a new cable channel: RYTV
      • Praise be unto God
      • Romney and the Muslim vote
      • Why Mitt lost: A parable
      • The scorpion that stung Mitt Romney
      • What fresh hell is this? (Updated)
      • Last-minute Romney scandals
      • And now you must choose...
      • This is as close to conspiracy theory as Josh Mars...
      • Mitt profited from the auto bailout
      • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these fina...
      • That's it. Obama's doomed.
      • Why are the pro-Romney forces spending big money i...
      • What to do when a Bishop goes bonkers?
      • Obama 2016!
      • Who did it? A child abuse mystery (UPDATED)
      • The non-human victims of Sandy
      • Is the election over...?
      • The Weimar error
      • My premature Romney political obituary
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile