WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Romney and the Muslim vote

Posted on 06:31 by Unknown
Right now, a lot of people are talking about the GOP's problems with Latinos. But there's another minority group that also deserves attention.

The Republican party has become the He-Man Muslim-Haters Club in recent years. I don't know how many Muslim votes Romney received in 2012, but I do know that in 2004, only four percent of Muslims voted for George W. Bush.

You may be surprised to learn that the situation was very different in 2000...
In the 2000 election, approximately 70% of Muslims in America voted for Bush; among non-African-American Muslims, the ratio was over 80%.
As a measure of how things have changed, one Muslim voter writes:
There is simply no way that I can justify voting for a party that denies the very legitimacy of my identity as an American. And there is no way that I can justify voting for any member of that party that does not, in the strongest possible terms, denounce that view. Nor can most other members of the American Muslim community, who just happen to be clustered in swing states like Ohio, Virginia, and Florida.
Would the Muslim vote have made a difference? Only one percent of Ohio residents are Muslims, which means that, of that state's 11,544,951 citizens, roughly 115,000 practice Islam. Of course, not all of those 115,000 participated in the election. We won't know for some time how exactly how many more people in that state voted for Obama than for Romney, but, obviously, the election was very close. The Republicans could have used an extra 40 or 50 thousand votes.

Romney could have gotten those votes if he had criticized the drone wars or offered a viable plan to restart the peace process. As things stand, the Islamic community has little reason to love Obama, but even less reason to like the GOP.

To paraphrase Churchill (again): Anti-Islamism is a good starter, but a bad finisher.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ▼  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ▼  November (41)
      • A thought just occurred to me...
      • Why they're after Rice
      • The country-we-dare-not-name is at it again
      • Glenn Beck and The Truth about bad art
      • Polonium and the press
      • Did Grover rewrite history?
      • Papa John's Pizza goes COMMIE!
      • Sartorial notes
      • Walmart or Wal-Mart? A correction
      • In observance of the Conspiracy Theorist Full Empl...
      • Happy Thanksgiving
      • How you can fix the system (without spending a dime)
      • Black Thursday
      • Gaza
      • Keep Black Friday on FRIDAY
      • What to do about Wal-Mart
      • Of Beck and Bain
      • Some women...!
      • Is Boot why Petraeus got the boot?
      • Petraeus
      • 2016 starts NOW!
      • A modest proposal for a new cable channel: RYTV
      • Praise be unto God
      • Romney and the Muslim vote
      • Why Mitt lost: A parable
      • The scorpion that stung Mitt Romney
      • What fresh hell is this? (Updated)
      • Last-minute Romney scandals
      • And now you must choose...
      • This is as close to conspiracy theory as Josh Mars...
      • Mitt profited from the auto bailout
      • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these fina...
      • That's it. Obama's doomed.
      • Why are the pro-Romney forces spending big money i...
      • What to do when a Bishop goes bonkers?
      • Obama 2016!
      • Who did it? A child abuse mystery (UPDATED)
      • The non-human victims of Sandy
      • Is the election over...?
      • The Weimar error
      • My premature Romney political obituary
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile