WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

Sanford

Posted on 11:49 by Unknown
This blog used to devote much cyber-ink to Republican politicians who tarnished the GOP's image as the party of family values. I was particularly amused by Mark Foley and former Speaker of the House Denny Hastert (one of the more obvious closeted gays in the history of Congress).

But I never truly wanted those guys to lose their jobs over sex scandals. For other reasons, yes. The sex stuff was simply...funny.

Which brings us to the case of Mark Sanford, who hopes to make a comeback. Sure, the "hiking the Appalachian Trail" thing amused me as much as it amused everyone else, but now -- well, I'm not sure I feel comfortable with Larry Flynt's satirical jabs at Sanford's indiscretions.
"No one has done more to expose the sexual hypocrisy of traditional values in America today. He is the man of the hour — the midnight hour," Flynt says in his endorsement posted online Tuesday afternoon. "He has demonstrated by his words and deeds that traditional values are shameful and that he will not live by such rules. As the bible teaches us: 'Ye shall know them by their fruits.'"
Don't get me wrong: I like Flynt. Sure, his porn was always kind of disgusting, even by porn standards -- back in my younger days, I'd look at Hustler only if I wanted to quell horniness -- but the guy is funny and politically savvy. And I admire that elaborate John Wayne monument he put in front of his building. Only a man of great wit and insouciance would place a massive piece of cowboy art in the middle of Beverly Hills on Wilshire Blvd.

Nevertheless, Flynt's jabs at Sanford are out of line. You can't combat sexual hypocrisy by being a hypocrite yourself.

A man's private life is his own business. Sins unrelated to either public policy or finance should not determine a politician's fate. There are plenty of reasons to vote against Sanford, but "the Appalachian Trail" is not among them.

I'm sorry now about the earlier Cannonfire posts on Hastert and Foley.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Spooks, war, financial skullduggery, Assange and Windows 8
    Gotta move quickly... That secret listening post. I thought that the preceding post -- which identifies the probable location of the secret...
  • The best blog post ever?
    A friend to this blog directs our attention to what may be the single finest blog post ever written . Wish to hell I had written it. But if ...
  • Did a Libertarian hero cause the Sandy Hook massacre?
    The headline above this post is, admittedly, a somewhat hyperbolic provocation. But there's a case to be made for its literal truth. A w...
  • Guns: Three scenarios
    This blog has never published a polemic in favor of any form of gun control. I've always presumed -- and still presume -- that the issue...
  • Did Obama quietly engineer the latest Egyptian coup?
    When the Muslim Brotherhood came to power in Egypt, they bent over backwards to placate Washington. They said, more-or-less, the required th...
  • Mona Lisa, men have maimed you
    I'm going to take some time away from editing my Leonardo da Vinci video to write a non-political Sunday post about...Leonardo da Vinci....
  • Notes...
    They're going after the Clintons again. The rightists pretended to be pro-Hillary in 2008, for comprehensible partisan reasons. But thi...
  • Good, but not good enough
    Al Franken is pushing a "stalking app" bill which will limit the amount of information your mobile unit can collect about you and...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Data dump on THAT divorce...
    Wow. I didn't know that the divorce of Mitt Romney's pal Tom Stemberg was this ugly . Multiple sources connected with the divorce t...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ▼  May (36)
      • Noted...
      • A politically-incorrect non-political post
      • Irate Republican Syndrome
      • Ginning up war
      • Show some guts, IRS -- go after the Tea Party liars!
      • "Closed for repairs"
      • How things have changed
      • o-BOMB-a: The movie
      • Seriously. This will be in the movie.
      • The Rosen quest: In (partial) defense of Eric Holder
      • Obama's drone speech
      • Terrorism and Pilate's question
      • Finally, a solution to the Great Crotch-Bomber Mys...
      • Listening to your telephone calls
      • Another one
      • Scandals, real and fake
      • This shit's gotta stop
      • Around and about...
      • AP spying: Were other news journals targeted too?
      • Double standard
      • Hawking
      • The Trilby of Doom
      • The "Christian" mass-murderer
      • 40 hours
      • Benghazi: What did the Republicans know, and when ...
      • Windows Blew
      • New, from Spook Press!
      • More things to worry about (Plus: How would Yoda s...
      • Why are the Republicans STILL flogging Benghazi?
      • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
      • The examined life is not worth living
      • Israel and Syria
      • Are they really going after a...a BANK?
      • Ain't it the truth
      • The real terror enablers
      • Sanford
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile