WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 7 February 2013

The next voice you hear...

Posted on 20:27 by Unknown
Alessandro Machi, a friend to this blog and the maven behind Daily PUMA and other good sites, had a rather disturbing encounter recently with a telephone pitchman -- a salesman with a difference: He was a robot.

We've all interacted with pre-recorded voices before. Usually, within a few seconds you understand that the person you're talking to isn't real. But in this case, the interactivity was so cleverly done it could fool a normal human being for an extended period of time. The back and forth went on for minutes.
After I had my, "oh my gosh, its pre-recorded people talking to me," moment, I paid close attention to make sure my suspicion was correct. When the human recorded "voice" heard me answer "no" to their final offer, I wanted to test my hypothesis that I was indeed talking to a human recorded voice.

I asked the human recorded voice what they thought of the super bowl. The voice did not have an answer and simply responded, "What did you say"?

I asked again in as clear and concise voice as I could muster, "What did you think of the Super Bowl", and the voice still did not understand, and then quickly said goodbye and the line disconnected.
Machi speculates that this technology could prove enormously useful to Ponzi schemers.
However, the victims are going to be the american consumer, and eventually the worldwide consumer, who will have to wade through never ending and ever increasing pre-recorded interactive sales calls, while the sales company spends virtually no money per call hawking their product or service. We will be fooled, and deluged, whether we like or not.
Me? I'm thinking of the phone sex possibilities.

More seriously, I can see how scammers could use this tech in social engineering schemes that could cajole older people into divulging personal information such as bank account numbers or credit card numbers.

In the online world, we have "Captcha" to insure that a comment is posted by an actual human being. (I recently had to institute Captcha on this very blog -- yet I'm still fending off sales spam comments!) Will we need an audio version of Captcha to separate our human-sounding telephone calls from our actual-human telephone calls?

Or -- odd thought -- are some people so lonely that we will happily talk to an interactive robot on the phone? 
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ▼  February (34)
      • Woodward
      • Lots to say...
      • Edgy
      • By the way...
      • Manufactured terror
      • Aaron Swartz, Julian Assange...and JFK?
      • Your rights
      • Up above the world so high...like a death ray from...
      • Obama wants to raid your fridge! It's the Apocalypse!
      • The "party before principle" principle
      • Al-Awlaki: The comic
      • Bout steak
      • Secret funding for climate denialists and Islamoph...
      • More on the minimum wage
      • Minimum wage
      • Watch the skies
      • Marco Rubio lies about the 2008 meltdown
      • Dorner
      • Anonymous threatens to disrupt the SOTU
      • A few points...
      • The artificiality of the Tea Party
      • Righty-right
      • Privacy invasion: It's worse than you think
      • More American insanity
      • America is going insane
      • HUMAN FILTH
      • Drone City: This must be the place
      • The next voice you hear...
      • The drone base
      • Mystifications
      • That white paper...
      • Orson W., Josef K. and Joseph C.
      • The game and the city
      • Did a Libertarian hero cause the Sandy Hook massacre?
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile