WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

The "party before principle" principle

Posted on 02:11 by Unknown
Sorry for the light posting; I'm working on a major video project. No $$ involved (although...who knows?), but I'm addressing a non-political issue of great importance.

Right now, I invite you to glance at this comic from the same team who put together the one-page al-Awlaki graphic novel featured in our previous post. This strip will hit home with many of you, since most Cannonfire readers have mounted serious left-wing critiques of our current president. (Hard to read? Click to enlarge, or go the link above.)


All of which brings us to today's puzzler.

It's apparent that both liberals and conservatives are guilty of putting party above principle. We all get so caught up in the horse race that we forget why the race exists in the first place.

When Dick Cheney said "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter," nobody on the right screeched at the veep. When a Democrat got into office, deficits suddenly mattered more than anything. Chalk it up to the "party over principle" principle.

On the other side of the aisle, many liberals voted for Obama because they thought he would be President Peace-Lover. When he turned out to be President Surge -- and then President Death-From-Above -- the Obots went into rationalization mode.

At least, some of them did.

Many did not. During the 2009-2011 period, lots of lefty blog commenters registered many a harsh complaint about Barack Obama, and there's no use pretending otherwise. In fact, I would say that -- for a while, at least -- the complainers outnumbered the rationalizers, even on Daily Kos. The left got scared back into Camp D only when the Republican primaries gave us a close look at the opposing forces.

So. Who is more likely to hold principle above partisanship -- your liberal friend or your conservative friend? Which one is most likely to concentrate on ideas rather than the endless game of shirts-vs-skins? Which one is most likely to fulminate at a leader of his or her own party?

Until very recently, I would have said that liberals are far more likely to express their disdain for Democratic politicians. (To cite but one example: Back in 2007, Nancy Pelosi probably had more left-wing enemies than right-wing enemies.) However, the Tea Party's recent activities -- particularly their extreme hatred of Karl Rove -- have forced me to reconsider.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ▼  February (34)
      • Woodward
      • Lots to say...
      • Edgy
      • By the way...
      • Manufactured terror
      • Aaron Swartz, Julian Assange...and JFK?
      • Your rights
      • Up above the world so high...like a death ray from...
      • Obama wants to raid your fridge! It's the Apocalypse!
      • The "party before principle" principle
      • Al-Awlaki: The comic
      • Bout steak
      • Secret funding for climate denialists and Islamoph...
      • More on the minimum wage
      • Minimum wage
      • Watch the skies
      • Marco Rubio lies about the 2008 meltdown
      • Dorner
      • Anonymous threatens to disrupt the SOTU
      • A few points...
      • The artificiality of the Tea Party
      • Righty-right
      • Privacy invasion: It's worse than you think
      • More American insanity
      • America is going insane
      • HUMAN FILTH
      • Drone City: This must be the place
      • The next voice you hear...
      • The drone base
      • Mystifications
      • That white paper...
      • Orson W., Josef K. and Joseph C.
      • The game and the city
      • Did a Libertarian hero cause the Sandy Hook massacre?
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile