WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 7 October 2012

Did the leader of France kill Gaddafi?

Posted on 03:07 by Unknown
Wow. If you think I have a weakness for conspiratorial scenarios, check out the U.K.'s Daily Mail. The headline: "Gaddafi was killed by French secret serviceman on orders of Nicolas Sarkozy, sources claim." 
A French secret serviceman acting on the express orders of Nicolas Sarkozy is suspected of murdering Colonel Gaddafi, it was sensationally claimed today.

He is said to have infiltrated a violent mob mutilating the captured Libyan dictator last year and shot him in the head.

The motive, according to well-placed sources in the North African country, was to stop Gaddafi being interrogated about his highly suspicious links with Sarkozy, who was President of France at the time.
Earlier this year, a somewhat sensationalistic French news site called Mediapart accused Sarkozy of taking a $65 million campaign donation from Gaddafi in 2007. There was even a Libyan document, bearing a 2006 date stamp, which gave details of the deal. An infuriated Sarkozy labeled this document a forgery and made lawsuit noises against the site, although I don't think anything further came of the matter.

So the question now facing us comes to this: If the Gaddafi/Sarkozy link is just a concoction, then why would Mediapart, the U.K. Daily Mail, and this unnamed Libyan source all try to convey a false impression?

Oddly enough, the Daily Mail published a story in October, 2011 identifying the man who killed Gaddafi. Actually, the name of the killer is not given, although his face is shown. There's something rather fishy about the 2011 story -- it reminds me of some of the less-believable reports we got in the very early days of the Iraq war. But the latest piece in the Daily Mail is also very, very iffy.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Why Mitt lost: A parable
    For a couple of hours, I watched the early election returns in a McDonalds. (My ladyfriend had sent me into the doghouse. The local doghouse...
  • Everything old is new again
    Have you noticed the trend? All sorts of old spook news is being presented as if it were new spook news. The latest example is a Foreign P...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ▼  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ▼  October (47)
      • Obama vs. FDR
      • Bob Kerrey
      • Mitt's flips
      • After Sandy
      • Strapped in! Plus: Around and about...
      • Various: Hurricanes, polls, Obama-vs-Taibbi, crook...
      • Screw you, Moulitsas
      • The Polls
      • Signs
      • Don't blame (or credit) Gloria
      • Data dump on THAT divorce...
      • In praise of old tech
      • Scandals! (IMPORTANT UPDATE)
      • Can't we all just vote today and have done with it?
      • The debate, the chart, and the vote
      • Voter ID fraud: The Al Franken example
      • Best poll news I've seen in days. Plus: What will ...
      • Is Carrel Hilton Sheldon the surprise?
      • The new October surprise (update)
      • Can Obama win?
      • Election integrity note...
      • I have to think about something else...
      • Update on the Surprise -- Turns out to be a gag
      • A Romney-sized rat
      • The Benghazi attack (And "Lyin' Ryan" redux)
      • Lyin' Ryan (with an update on Romney/Obama II)
      • Ohio electronic voting machines linked to Bain
      • Small note...
      • Noted...
      • Bain is still outsourcing jobs to China
      • The Ryan debate video is running late
      • I'll be damned...
      • When polls push
      • Stimulating Ryan
      • Biden-Ryan
      • MITT LIES! The ultimate expose!
      • Mitt's biggest lie! (You won't find this anywhere ...
      • Newt admits it
      • Did the leader of France kill Gaddafi?
      • Straight from the pit of Hell
      • Did Mitt cheat? Sure looks like it...
      • Why did Barack Obama bring a lollipop to a knife f...
      • There wasn't much fire, but they did have wire
      • Live-blogging the debate (Updated continually)
      • Attend the tale of Akin, Todd
      • Maybe Obama SHOULDN'T win the first debate
      • Republican voter registration fraud in California
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile