WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

Who do you truss

Posted on 05:32 by Unknown
I'm not going to allow any comments of any sort for this post. But if you've been harassed (as I have been) by conspiracy cranks who continually bellow about why Building Fucking Seven fell down on September 11, 2001, you should read this seemingly-unrelated article on doorway truss signs in Slate.
Why do firefighters need to know about truss construction? Because it’s particularly dangerous in fires. One utterly terrifying presentation notes that trusses can fail “quickly when heated—in as little as 1-2 minutes.” Trusses also “fail without warning,” and “don’t get ‘spongy’ before failing,” so “ ‘sounding’ a roof is of no help” to firefighters. Most worrying of all, when firefighters arrive at a fire, they have no way of knowing how long a truss has already been subjected to heat.
Now imagine a building with a massive truss design situated over a hidden power plant (ten 35-foot towers) and nearly 150,000 gallons of fuel and oil, in tanks connected by fuel lines snaking throughout the building. All of that was built in defiance of NYC law. Technically, the building didn't have to follow those laws, since it was under the jurisdiction of the Port Authority -- but that technicality would not have prevented class action lawsuits galore, if the truth were more widely known. 

So the only real mystery is why the building stayed up as long as it did. I doubt that an official report will ever point to the "transfer truss" design, which -- as Slate has just now verified -- is both inherently unstable and in widespread usage throughout the country. For the same reason, you'll also never see an official report verifying Paul Brodeur's assertions that proximity to power lines can increase the likelihood of cancer in children.

Remember: No comments allowed. I won't even read your words -- not even if you have something positive to say. In the past, the fucking 9/11 "controlled demolition" nuts have proved so vile and unpleasant that I have resolved never to allow them a voice here again. They're like the clambering hive-minded zombies in World War Z -- you can't reason with 'em.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Spooks, war, financial skullduggery, Assange and Windows 8
    Gotta move quickly... That secret listening post. I thought that the preceding post -- which identifies the probable location of the secret...
  • The best blog post ever?
    A friend to this blog directs our attention to what may be the single finest blog post ever written . Wish to hell I had written it. But if ...
  • Mona Lisa, men have maimed you
    I'm going to take some time away from editing my Leonardo da Vinci video to write a non-political Sunday post about...Leonardo da Vinci....
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Notes...
    They're going after the Clintons again. The rightists pretended to be pro-Hillary in 2008, for comprehensible partisan reasons. But thi...
  • Did a Libertarian hero cause the Sandy Hook massacre?
    The headline above this post is, admittedly, a somewhat hyperbolic provocation. But there's a case to be made for its literal truth. A w...
  • Good, but not good enough
    Al Franken is pushing a "stalking app" bill which will limit the amount of information your mobile unit can collect about you and...
  • Guns: Three scenarios
    This blog has never published a polemic in favor of any form of gun control. I've always presumed -- and still presume -- that the issue...
  • Did Obama quietly engineer the latest Egyptian coup?
    When the Muslim Brotherhood came to power in Egypt, they bent over backwards to placate Washington. They said, more-or-less, the required th...
  • Anonymous threatens to disrupt the SOTU
    Let's see what happens... The threatening message lists the persecutions of Aaron Swartz and Bradley Manning as two of the motives for ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ▼  July (45)
      • Manning found guilty on most charges, but not of "...
      • A new low in religious hypocrisy
      • That's one dangerous piece of geography
      • Control
      • Open letter to Alexander Konovalov, Russia's Minis...
      • They're not even TRYING to hide it any more
      • My questions
      • Once again -- the Hastings accident
      • Twelve bucks an hour: What would happen?
      • "We don't need no education..."
      • Congress vs. NSA
      • Bella update
      • Uncle Sam's hackers: A new theory of the death of ...
      • A bill that everyone should support
      • We may have a solution...!
      • More on the Michael Hastings mystery
      • Elizabeth Warren DESTROYS
      • The bare minimum
      • The NSA says: "Dig...INFINITY!"
      • The Night Witches
      • Burglaries attributed to Bachmann aide -- updated
      • Watchers in the sky
      • Hunger
      • Noted
      • Was Obama blackmailed? Was Cheney in charge?
      • The next bombshell?
      • Undersea cables and the NSA
      • The best blog post ever?
      • Spy hard
      • Welcome back, my friends, to the smear that never ...
      • Did Obama quietly engineer the latest Egyptian coup?
      • Lots of people hate Edward Snowden. Why don't they...
      • A Perry-related witisism
      • EPIC news!
      • The crash and the cop
      • The fun never stops
      • A love story
      • Update
      • Sorry for the light posting
      • How Sallie Mae aids the Great Student Loan Ripoff
      • Taiwan does Wendy Davis
      • Who do you truss
      • Wayne Madsen? Oh dear...
      • Obama supports jihadis who beheaded a priest
      • The color fascist
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile