WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 13 December 2012

Rice withdraws

Posted on 13:30 by Unknown
I was saddened to learn that Susan Rice has withdrawn her name from consideration as Secretary of State. The proximate cause was, of course, the inane controversy over Benghazi:
Rice, who was considered a top contender for the position, has been embroiled recently in ongoing controversy surrounding her account of the September 11 Libya attacks, which she discussed in a series of talk show appearances on September 16. 
Infuriating. There is no genuine scandal here; the whole pseudo-controversy was ginned up by the Republicans as an election-year gimmick.

I mean, come on -- just what it, exactly, that the Republicans have been trying to say? Do they really think that Obama lied about the attack because he was somehow trying to cover up for his Mooooslim buddies in Al Qaeda? That kind of paranoid nonsense might seem credible to sub-Trumpian birthers and cognate aficionados of quasi-psychotic absurdia, but the idea is laughable to all rational people.

Everything Rice said about Benghazi derived from reports she received from the intelligence community. If those reports got the story wrong, you can't blame her. It's not as though she personally went snooping around Libya looking for the truth, then lied about what she found.

If the CIA offered varying descriptions of what happened on September 11 -- and they did -- we must presume that their analysts received conflicting reports from their human and electronic sources. That kind of dispute happens all the freakin' time in the world of intelligence analysis.

Whenever a violent outbreak occurs, historians often argue about who did what when -- and those arguments have been known to span centuries. We still don't know whether the Russians or the French set the great Moscow fire of 1812. We still don't know precisely how Wat Tyler's rebellion originated. People still argue about the sequence of events surrounding the Boston Massacre.

Turning the Libyan attack into a weapon against the Democrats was always nothing more than a cheap, low GOP ploy. The Republicans thought that spinning absurdities about Benghazi could bring down Obama. When that line of attack failed, they settled on a secondary target. Rice.

Their obvious goal is to push John Kerry into that post, thereby freeing up his seat for Brown.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Did the Syrian REBELS use chemical weapons?
    From the start, I mistrusted the allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons against the U.S.-backed, Al Qaeda-linked rebels hoping to ...
  • HUMAN FILTH
    A 28 year-old woman went into a branch of the Louvre and used permanent marker to scrawl "AE 911" on Delacroix's immortal ...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
    Well, here's something you don't see every day: MarketWatch, affiliated with the Wall Street Journal, has published a strong piece c...
  • Hastings thought someone had tampered with his car
    I didn't want to crowd out the preceding post so soon, because the topic is important and I even did a spot of original research on the ...
  • What about the Senate?
    According to Pew, Obama has an 8 point edge over Romney. Rachel Maddow spent much of her show crowing about the new numbers, while wonderin...
  • White Christmas, crazy Christmas
    Being a California lad, I've not had many white Christmases. But the first snow of the season fell today in Baltimore, and the town look...
  • Is Obama screwing us again? Already?
    I had hoped Obama would refrain from screwing us over until after the inauguration. The outcome of the fiscal cliff negotiations will tell ...
  • Chemical weapons in Syria: Whodunnit?
    Well, John Kerry may have achieved his "Colin Powell at the UN" moment... In some of the administration’s most strident language,...
  • The best blog post ever?
    A friend to this blog directs our attention to what may be the single finest blog post ever written . Wish to hell I had written it. But if ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ▼  2012 (161)
    • ▼  December (37)
      • Whatever happened to Saul Alinski?
      • Worse than the cliff
      • A theory of the Batman massacre...
      • The cliff, the cliff, the goddamned cliff...
      • Was there a second shooter?
      • Variously: Suing infiltrators, FBI vs. Occupy, ANO...
      • White Christmas, crazy Christmas
      • Leningrad
      • "Brainwashing" and the Batman massacre
      • The unhinged
      • Live-blogging Doomsday
      • Guns: Three scenarios
      • Forecast
      • Joe Biden gives his guarantee
      • Heckling Hagel
      • No cuts to Social Security!
      • Why do our young go violently mad?
      • Deal or no deal
      • The Sandy Hook Elementary massacre: Strange detail...
      • Good, but not good enough
      • Politicizing tragedy
      • Mike Huckabee, super genius
      • The tragedy
      • Against Kerry; for Huntsman. (With sadness.)
      • Rice withdraws
      • Smile! Bolon is coming!
      • The Milteer thing
      • The Real Murdoch Scandal
      • "Right to work" isn't right and doesn't work
      • Is Obama screwing us again? Already?
      • On this day, December 7...
      • More malware to worry about
      • Firebomb
      • Fantasyland
      • Killing Kennedy
      • Just how smart is Mitt Romney?
      • Cliff notes
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile