WhodunnitCannonfire

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 5 November 2012

This is as close to conspiracy theory as Josh Marshall gets

Posted on 06:22 by Unknown
Josh Marshall has received a report which, though vague, bugs him. It bugs me too, because it ties in with a lot of strange material I've been seeing on the right-wing sites.

Under the heading "This could get weird," Marshall writes:
Listening to a story from a friend this evening. Guy in a social setting talking to a group of Wall Street heavyweights. Every single one in the room certain Romney wins. Has Ohio locked. Has the whole thing tied up. No doubt.
And that's it. But it's enough to unnerve, is it not? 

Most of the final polling shows Obama opening up or expanding upon a lead, and yet some conservative bloggers are sounding a triumphalist "got it in the bag" theme. Their lack of worry has me worried. 

I'm also bugged by the outlier polls from GOP-friendly firms which show Romney ahead or even-steven in places like Pennsylvania and Minnesota, even though all other polls show a comfortable Obama lead. Biased polling is a factor in American politics, but such reports usually show up earlier in the cycle. In the final stretch of the final stretch, polling firms usually try to get real. 

Incidentally, one of the above links goes to WizBang, where Doug Johnson argues that Romney will win because 59% of Independents will vote Republican. Johnson ignores one of the odder aspects of this election -- many conservatives have shed the "R" identifier. Registered Republicans are down to only 24-25 percent of the electorate, while Dems are at 32 percent and Independents are at 38, an all-time high. 

The interesting question is this: Have the non-R conservatives escaped the confines of the party because they think modern Republicans politicians are too extreme? Or has the GOP label lost its allure because the candidates are not extreme enough?

At any rate, the difference between 32% D and 24% R explains why there are more right-leaning Indys.  It also explains why the polls allegedly "skewed" in favor of Team D aren't really skewed at all.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • More Syrian weirdness
    This post is a follow-up to the one below. Although most Americans aren't paying much attention to the Syrian rebellion, that situation ...
  • Some women...!
    Time for a brief update on the Petraeus thing. First: What is it about certain women? For years, people have asked why Paris Hilton and Kim...
  • Nothing to hide
    When sheep-imitative Americans tell you that they don't care about NSA surveillance because they have nothing to hide, ask why they have...
  • The Polls
    Sorry for the lack of posting. I've had to deal with some real-life unpleasantries -- including a malfunctioning computer. Right now, I...
  • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
    Twenty years ago, people called you paranoid if you said that the American media engages in smear campaigns. Now everyone acknowledges this ...
  • More on the Michael Hastings mystery
    The above video features an interview with Joe Biggs, a friend to Michael Hastings. Biggs, who strikes me as a calm and rational observer, f...
  • Ghost radar!
    I'm sick of writing NSA stories and you're sick of reading them. So right now, I'd like to talk about something that happened as...
  • Did Grover rewrite history?
    You've probably been following the "Is Grover over?" controversy. Republicans have been backing away from Grover Norquist'...
  • AP spying: Were other news journals targeted too?
    Not much time to write, but I did want to mention the one real Obama administration scandal to emerge in recent days. Benghazi and the IRS ...
  • Windows Blew
    You may recall my blistering review of Windows 8 . A lot of people agreed with that negative assessment, which is why Microsoft -- in what m...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (339)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ▼  2012 (161)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ▼  November (41)
      • A thought just occurred to me...
      • Why they're after Rice
      • The country-we-dare-not-name is at it again
      • Glenn Beck and The Truth about bad art
      • Polonium and the press
      • Did Grover rewrite history?
      • Papa John's Pizza goes COMMIE!
      • Sartorial notes
      • Walmart or Wal-Mart? A correction
      • In observance of the Conspiracy Theorist Full Empl...
      • Happy Thanksgiving
      • How you can fix the system (without spending a dime)
      • Black Thursday
      • Gaza
      • Keep Black Friday on FRIDAY
      • What to do about Wal-Mart
      • Of Beck and Bain
      • Some women...!
      • Is Boot why Petraeus got the boot?
      • Petraeus
      • 2016 starts NOW!
      • A modest proposal for a new cable channel: RYTV
      • Praise be unto God
      • Romney and the Muslim vote
      • Why Mitt lost: A parable
      • The scorpion that stung Mitt Romney
      • What fresh hell is this? (Updated)
      • Last-minute Romney scandals
      • And now you must choose...
      • This is as close to conspiracy theory as Josh Mars...
      • Mitt profited from the auto bailout
      • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these fina...
      • That's it. Obama's doomed.
      • Why are the pro-Romney forces spending big money i...
      • What to do when a Bishop goes bonkers?
      • Obama 2016!
      • Who did it? A child abuse mystery (UPDATED)
      • The non-human victims of Sandy
      • Is the election over...?
      • The Weimar error
      • My premature Romney political obituary
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile